BoyChat

From Wikisposure

(Redirected from Boychat)
Jump to: navigation, search
BoyChat
Created December 29, 1995
Referred to as BC, BoyChat
Based out of Varies, currently the site is hosted in the Netherlands
Founder Kasper
Purpose For pedophiles who like young boys to talk to each other.
URL
http://boychat.org
Affiliations
Free Spirits Coalition
Synopsis
Major, long-lasting pedophile message board, dedicted to, and operated by pedophiles who like young boys.
Front page of boychat.org
Front page of boychat.org
BoyChat is the name of a message board and organization for pedophiles who are sexually attracted to little boys. They discuss everything from politics to clothing trends to specific boy actors. The moderators there, called "Cogs", monitor the board closely to keep the content legal, so that they will not be taken offline, or investigated by police. The administration of the website maintains that the talk that happens there, and their activities are perfectly legal, and that they are just exercising their freedom to speak.

However, there are several murders and many occasions of child sexual abuse related to the users of BoyChat.

Their logo includes the phrase, "You are not alone," which many people believe is the biggest problem with this message board. The posters there reassure each other that it is okay to be a pedophile, and that they should embrace their feelings. In other words, it's likely that their comradery emboldens them to act on their desires, rather than seek help for them. Indeed, any time treatment is brought up, the idea is heavily flamed, and, when asked if they would want to change, if they could, there is usually a resounding "No way!" from most of them.


Contents

[edit] History

BoyChat was founded by a pedophile who uses the name Kasper, on December 29, 1995. Since then, it's gone through many groups of administration.

[edit] Staff

Send to all: (prf@freespirits.org)

Webmaster: Dylan Thomas (bcwebmaster@freespirits.org)

Registration and Signature Pictures:
Maintenance Elf
Coggle
Tycho (sigpix@freespirits.org)

Digest Team (bcdigest@freespirits.org)
afin (Editor) (afin@freespirits.org)
Scapegoat (scapegoat@freespirits.org)
Jean-Baptiste le Bonhomme
JeanBoy

Statmaster: bcstatmaster@freespirits.org

Fundraiser: fntm (bcfundraiser@freespirits.org)

Cogs (Moderators):
Aztram (AzCog@freespirits.org)
Buke (buke@freespirits.org)
Coggle (coggle@freespirits.org)
Cogito Sum (cogitosum@freespirits.org)
Hasmal (hasmal@freespirits.org)
Maintenance Elf (MaintenanceElf@freespirits.org)
Orpheus (orpheus@freespirits.org)
Peter Piper (peter.piper@freespirits.org)
Scapegoat (scapegoat@freespirits.org)
Tycho (tycho@freespirits.org)
Tyler (tyler@freespirits.org)
Ed

[edit] Notable Members

Ghost Writer

Wabbit

Robbie

Sparks

Chimpo

[edit] Convicted and Registered Sex Offenders on BoyChat

Abraxas

boybuddy

Ghost Writer

Somersault

boystory

Hulann

Nickless

jonasbark

Bill Evans

Dylan Thomas

MRB

Phantom

albertRoss

littlexs

Memnoch

slvrspun

Wolfboi

dannywyatt

[edit] Active Link(s)

http://boychat.org
Nick List

[edit] Media

http://www.wweek.com/html/leada100798.html

[edit] Quotes

I would guess...

...that the preteen rectum is more easily penetrated than the preteen vagina. No personal experience here, but I have seen rather small children deposit some pretty impressive dumps into the toilet—some noticeably larger than my (I presume) fairly average erect penis. If these big dumps can come out without lube, then I guess something a little smaller, with the benefit of lube, could certainly go in a few inches without undo discomfort.

Would your average older preteen be interested in (receiving) gentle, shallow, anal intercourse? Probably not in our society, but that is a reflection more on our society's anti-sex stance that on anything inherently wrong with the act.

zlurker

Fuck yeah i dream of penetration all the damn time! After all i want a boy to stick his hot sexy boy penis in me! I fucking masturbate to that damn fantasy, in both holes even!!

Crysta

Let's not pretend. The site was all about nude pics of babies and toddlers. One can pretend otherwise but that's the unvarnished truth. Two year old dicks and assholes. That was the reality.

Jim

The fact of the matter is, we hold all the cards. We (speaking on the broad scale) have sex with their children. And when they arrest us and put us in jail, a zillion more of us are still having sex with their children. And when they get us in therapy and "cure" us and teach us how not to "offend," a zillion more of us still slip through the cracks and still have sex with their children.

And there's not a damn thing they can do about it.

For every pedophile they arrest and put in jail, ten more are fucking their children.

I love it when the bloggers say, "They want us to believe they're harmless, but look, so-and-so got arrested!" That just shows how clueless they are. We are not harmless. We never claim to be harmless. That's their own wishful thinking. The truth is, they will never be rid of us. Their children will never be "safe" (as they define "safe"). We are the most dangerous people in the world, and there isn't a damned thing they can do about it..

Some boys - especially adolescents enjoy the experience of being penetrated. The anus is a very versatile orifice, and the line between unbearable pain and pleasures unheard of can be one of simple patience and consideration of the other's wishes. Given that the partner is competent, most boys should be able to experience a painless or pleasurable penetration by an average sized man in one short session. I would have certainly enjoyed this experience at a far earlier age given a gentle partner.
I have occasionally thought about killing boys (and every other type of person), but I don't normally allow those ones free reign, and I don't entertain thoughts of gunning children for more than a few seconds. If I ever think about it, it's not for pleasure, but just to get inside the heads of other people who do such things, in order to try and understand them, and usually after reading the newspaper articles about murders in the Congo region. Personally, I find it a difficult mindset. I would have thought that the usual feelings that people generally have for children would kick in strongly, but I know circumstances in that region are not normal. I know that the people who do commit atrocities like that are virtually running on someone else's autopilot mode, and not thinking carefully and rationally for themselves.


Fantasies. Fantasies. Fantasies. Fantasies.

Yes, I have sex with jeebuz in some fantasies, his bloodied, ragged body laying limp on the cross, while in r/l I utilize the baby jeebus buttplug.

Ever have fantasies about ghosts? Possession? Being a cat or some sort of mutant half breed and purrin' your affections? Getting sodomized by tigger's tail? Or showing elmo just how much it can tickle?

I use the word 'boylove' cautiously and settle for just saying I like boys a helluvalot which includes a strong sexual component. For many people here that just makes me a small step above a psycho rapist.. a base animal of some sort. Doesn't bother me in the slightest. Real boys are not sexless little angels, but certainly are very sexually attractive. For me it's just a fact of nature.. no religious basis, no moral basis, just is. We're all animals (albeit complex) responding to our natural instincts. My lust is part of my humanity too, so I make no apologies whatsoever for desiring to stick my dick into the bums of boys (and girls) of many ages.

Boys are as varied as adults. Some have big dicks, others small, some like to be bottoms, others tops, still others are quite versatile. But you imply there exists in your fantasies just a single boy: he has certain tastes about anal sex and a certain dick size-- and to justify your personal conclusion you need to assume all boys are identical to your one fantasy boy.

I'm not surprised by your position. I have often contended that most posters here are much more in love with a certain (media designed and propagated) 'fantasy' of boyhood than with any real boys with their real dicks and assholes (of various proportions and potential uses). And that boychat instead of creating a virtual counter-culture that brings these larger (and oppressive) societal values into question, simply reinforces them.


This is a post that was made almost 10 years ago on BoyChat. It's the post of a pedophile, but it's also the post of a survivor of sexual abuse, and it's very potent:

Submitted by SnowFire on August 18, 1998 at 18:46:48:

SnowFire

I awoke from a nightmare. Beads of sweat carressed my body like the hands that I had been dreaming of. Cold hands. Dead hands. Unloving hands. My father's hands.

I couldn't move. I dared not move...nor make a sound. I choked back a moan that welled in my throat. Would it ever stop?

We danced...in the night upon the bed, in the darkness (the darkness of souls torn asunder). We danced with a rhythm of damnation. Danced like kindred spirits in a dance of the damned. Neither wanting to dance nor wanting to stop.

But we did stop and he lay there, breathing deeply of his sin. He inhaled the bitter fragrance of his damnation and wallowed in his sweet oblivion.

I dared not cry. Tears would spoil the moment for him. Tears would bring down the illusion that I was enjoying myself. Tears would only show the pain that he was bringing me. No, I dared not cry...tears were forbidden. So I lay there, my body and my soul laid bare before him.

Then I felt his hands upon me...touching, carressing, probing, prodding. Cold hands. Dead hands. Hands that touched my body but not my spirit, not my spirit. Not my spirit because there was no more spirit to touch. It danced away from me like a ghostly dream. Something that I once had but no longer could envision.

What love I had left died that night, upon that bed, in the darkness, the darkness of a soul that could no longer feel. My love died...a cold lonely death, unmourned, unnoticed in its passing. For the briefest of moments, it was there...tugging briefly at my heartstrings. Then it was gone. There was nothing. No remorse, no pity, no hatred, no desire, no love...no nothing. I could feel nothing. I WAS nothing.

Another dance? he asked, although he and I both already knew the answer. It was always the same. He asked, but never waited for an answer.

I lay upon my stomach and buried my head in the pillow. Dance with me, his voice whispered in my mind. DANCE WITH ME. I danced. I always danced. There was nothing left to do but to dance. It had become my whole world. When it wasn't happening, I was worrying about when it would happen again. I always danced. I had no choice.

There were screams. There was pain. There was the dance...there was always the dance."

THIS is the reply from another pedophile, and the reason that this site, and many other anti-pedophile sites and organizations and laws exist:

Submitted by Piece Peace Peach Fudge on August 20, 1998 at 05:28:10:

Hi Snowfire et al,

Snowfire wrote: All I ask is that you try to understand me, perhaps a little support and love, but I didn't come here looking for help or pity. I came here because BC looked like a place with caring, loving people and I believe I need that. Is that too much to ask?

Well, it may be. :) But I did in fact find myself pondering your relation of abuse in my meditation, and the more I looked into it, the more I learned. I learned about myself and some paths became clearer again, which is always a good thing. First, I want to thank you for having the courage to share something so personal. A lot of the folks here get wrapped up in their hypersensitivity, but they do listen, and I think they try to see through their tears.

I'd like to try to share with you some of the thoughts and revelations I had. These aren't really organized and I'm not trying to make a particular point. But since your post was of value to me I thought I would at least give you something in return, however humble.

Each of these is in a little box called a thought-box...

Trying to see Snowfire's dad... a man who probably did love his son, and probably not a bad person. So why the infamy? When a person is starved, as boylovers in this world are so often, they become full of despair. They lose faith in the world and feel that it has betrayed them. So they betray the world, and theirselves. Their sense of right and wrong has been crushed, because they can see no fairness in how they have been treated. So why treat anyone else fairly? This is despair.

You were a son, but also a boy. You were a sexual object. When your father's eyes glazed over and his primal hungers took him, he did not see you just as his son - he saw you as an object of desire, an object of lust. He consumed because he was hungry. In itself lust is not wrong, but it can be damaging when sexuality becomes violent. But the fact that you were an object of lust is not a cause for shame.

It is right that you eat a cow or a piece of fruit - that you consume life? Is it right when a wolf eats a rabbit? Is life treating the rabbit fairly? Life consumes life. We all consume and are consumed.

Your father took from you, he fed off your beauty and your youth. Had you given this freely, as it is your nature, it would have been joyful for you. But his hunger was such that you never had that chance, and it has left a scar, a feeling of bitter loss - the source of your anger.

Yes you are a victim. So is your father. You are victims of a world which denies the beauty of your nature, which drives you to desperation and despair. In your father's case that meant taking favors from you with guile. He was treated the same in his life, robbed of his self-love. Where does it end? Your pain is a price. You paid that price to gain something. If you don't steal as your father stole, if you are the martyr who has been injured but does not injure, then the cycle of abuse ends with you, and the cycle of karma is cleansed.

But there is more to it...

Snowfire is a "victim" as long as he sees his role that way. He was part of a relationship, an abusive unpleasant one. But even the victim designs his role. Take responsibility for your life.

You stayed in that relationship because you got something out of it. Maybe you needed to be touched. You would have liked it to be less forceful, but you needed it nonetheless. There was love and sympathetic fuel there.

[edit] More Information

If you have more information on this organization, it's ownership, members or other helpful knowledge, please contact admin@wikisposure.com.

Wikisposure Simple Navigation :   Categories  |  Articles List  |  New Pages  |  Random Page  |  Search  |  Wanted Pages

Personal tools
Updates from PJFI.org